BMR Calculator
Resting metabolic rate in kcal per day from Mifflin-St Jeor, broken out hourly and as a sedentary day. It is not an intake target.
BMR Calculator workspace
Parameters Configuration
Ready for calculations
Configure parameters on the left and press Calculate.
Using BMR Calculator
Choose metric or imperial; pounds and inches are converted internally before the equation runs.
Set your age on the slider, between 15 and 80.
Choose male or female, which selects the +5 or -161 constant.
Enter weight and height in the units you selected.
Read the daily resting figure, the same rate per hour, and the sedentary-day estimate at 1.2 times resting.
The Mifflin-St Jeor equation for resting energy expenditure: ten times weight in kilograms, plus 6.25 times height in centimetres, minus five times age, then plus 5 for men or minus 161 for women. The page also shows that rate per hour and multiplied by 1.2 for a sedentary day.
Basal metabolic rate is the energy your body spends doing nothing at all: pumping blood, breathing, holding a temperature, running the brain and kidneys and liver. It is the largest single component of most people's daily expenditure, usually somewhere between 60% and 70% of it, and it is the floor everything else is added to.
The equation this page uses
The estimate comes from the Mifflin-St Jeor equation, which predicts resting rate from weight, height, age and sex:
Men: 10 x weight(kg) + 6.25 x height(cm) - (5 x age) + 5
Women: 10 x weight(kg) + 6.25 x height(cm) - (5 x age) - 161A 30-year-old man of 80 kg and 180 cm gives 800 + 1,125 - 150 + 5 = 1,780 kcal a day. The calculator also breaks that into 74.2 kcal an hour, and shows 2,136 kcal as the sedentary-day figure — the resting rate multiplied by 1.2, which is roughly what a desk-bound day costs.
Why Mifflin-St Jeor rather than Harris-Benedict
The Harris-Benedict equation dates from 1919 and was fitted to a small sample of adults whose body composition differs from the modern population it is still applied to. Frankenfield and colleagues reviewed the predictive equations against measured resting expenditure in a 2005 systematic review in the *Journal of the American Dietetic Association*, and Mifflin-St Jeor came out as the most reliable of the widely used formulas in non-obese adults. It is the default in most clinical nutrition software for that reason.
Reliable here means less wrong on average. For an individual the prediction still typically lands within about 10% of the measured value, which on 1,780 kcal is a spread of roughly 180 kcal in either direction. The equation cannot see your body composition: it infers from height, weight, age and sex, so two people of identical build and very different muscle mass receive identical answers, and the more muscular of the two burns more than predicted.
This number is not a calorie target
The most common misreading of a basal rate is to treat it as an intake goal. Eating 1,780 kcal because that is your resting expenditure means eating well under what a day of walking, working and standing costs — the deficit is unintentional and often large. A resting rate becomes an intake figure only after multiplying by an activity factor, which is what the calorie calculator does.
There is also a naming muddle worth knowing about. True basal rate is measured after an overnight fast, at rest, in a thermally neutral room, before the subject has got up. Resting metabolic rate is measured under looser conditions and comes out perhaps 10% higher. Predictive equations were validated against resting measurements, so what this page gives you is closer to RMR than to strict BMR, whatever the label says.
Where the estimate breaks down
The equation was fitted to adults and should not be applied to children. It does not hold in pregnancy, and it has no way to account for untreated thyroid disease, significant illness, or the metabolic adaptation that follows a long period of restriction — all of which move resting expenditure away from what height and weight predict. At the extremes of body size the prediction degrades further, since very heavy adults carry a lower proportion of metabolically active tissue than the formula assumes.
If you want a rough sense of how your build compares with population averages, the BMI calculator uses the same two measurements for a different purpose. The calculation here happens entirely in your browser, your figures are not transmitted, and your own browser may keep them so the form is still filled in when you return. No clinician has reviewed this page.
Frequently asked
Should I eat the number of calories this returns?
No, and this is the most common misreading of a resting rate. It is what you burn lying still, before any walking, working or standing is added. Eating to it produces an unintended and often large deficit. Multiply by an activity factor first, which is what the calorie calculator does.
Is the figure basal rate or resting rate?
Strictly it is closer to resting rate. True basal measurement requires an overnight fast, a thermally neutral room and a subject who has not yet got up; resting measurement uses looser conditions and comes out perhaps 10% higher. The predictive equations were fitted against resting measurements, so that is what you are seeing whatever the label says.
Why Mifflin-St Jeor rather than Harris-Benedict?
Harris-Benedict dates from 1919 and was fitted to a small sample unlike the population it is still applied to. Frankenfield and colleagues compared the common predictive equations against measured expenditure in a 2005 systematic review in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, and Mifflin-St Jeor came out most reliable for non-obese adults.
Does the equation account for how much muscle I carry?
It cannot. The inputs are height, weight, age and sex, so two people of identical build and very different lean mass receive identical answers — and the more muscular of the two burns more than predicted. Body composition is the main reason an individual result drifts from the equation.